It may have been in the works for quite some time, but it seems as though Youtube has finally gone the HD route. Of course, only the videos actually uploaded in High Definition will give you the option of watching them in HD, but its nice to see the huge difference once you click the "Watch in HD" button, provided you have a fast enough connection speed.
If you yourself would like one of these HD Watchable options, it seems as though you have to upload your content in a minimum of HD 720, which is 1280x720 resolution. Which of course is going to take a lot longer to upload if your content is decent quality. I'm currently exporting some of my older movies in 720P where possible, since the normal quality of Youtube always looked awful when I uploaded them in the past.
This is definitely a welcome addition, giving people the option of showing their content in much, much better quality.
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Youtube in HD
Posted by
Dan McCallum
at
4:42 PM
4
comments
Monday, November 24, 2008
Photography Basics - Sensor Size
For the first post on the Photography Basic's series, I thought I would start with the so called "brain" of digital cameras, which of course is the sensor. This item one of the most important features inside the camera body, as it is the thing that actually "sees" or senses the images you capture. Sensors come in a large variety of shapes and sizes, and even employ many different ways of capturing light. I will briefly cover these points, but the main focus will be on how sensor size in a camera affects the images it takes.
First some basics. In film cameras, the frames of film act as the light sensitive medium which capture the image. In digital cameras, the film is replaced by a light sensitive sensor, and becomes permanent in contrast to the single use frames of film. Sensors in digital cameras primarily use either a CCD (Charged Coupled Device) or CMOS (Complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor), both of which of course have their positive and negative points, but these are beyond the scope of this article.
The main point I wish to talk about is the size of the sensor, because if you are trying to decide upon a digital camera, its going to come with a sensor regardless, and the more important point is the size of it and how it will affect your images/lens choices.
Sensor size primarily affects two things in images - sensitivity to light, and focal length. The light sensitivity point is fairly simple - the larger the sensor, the more surface area there is for light to be absorbed. But there are also other things that factor into a sensors sensitivity - pixel count, and how closely the pixel sensors are placed together. As cameras pack larger and larger amounts of pixels, or Megapixels onto the sensor, the pixel sensor sizes have to shrink down as well. Of course, sensor technology is always improving making each location more sensitive and tightly packed than before, but lowering the pixel count still counts towards greater sensitivity. This means you can take pictures in darker places without a tripod, or have sharper images in low light conditions. For example, the new Canon 5D MkII, with its 22MP sensor, is bound to be less light sensitive than the older Canon 5D with a 12MP sensor, even though sensor technology has improved for the latter.
If you have ever tried to shoot a photo or video with a small sensor, you might have noticed how bad the photo or footage turned out. Usually in low light situations, the camera will try to raise the ISO or sensitivity levels, sometimes artificially in the case of gain, which makes everything look pixelated and usually riddled with artifacts or noise. The only way to get around this really is to either introduce more light or use a better camera (with a larger sensor).
Because 35mm film has been the standard medium of photography for a very long time, most digital photography terms use 35mm as reference for comparison. 35mm is considered 1:1, at least in the photography world, and a reference of quality. There only exist a few digital cameras that fall into the 35mm (Full Frame) category of sensor size. The first mainstream camera with this size sensor was the Canon 5D, which was followed by the Nikon D700 (There of course were other more professional grade full frame cameras, with more professional price brackets). Because 35mm frame size is used as the reference, lenses and focal lengths are based off this size or field of view. The markings on lenses give their focal lenths in millimeters. The main thing to remember about this is that the measurements are in reference to a full frame sized sensor or 35mm film. What this means, very simply, is that when you use this lens with a sensor that is bigger or smaller than this size, it will give you a different perceived focal length.
The two main sensor sizes from Canon and Nikon are slightly less than 35mm, roughly around 1/4 smaller. This changes the perceived focal length, or Crop Factor. The crop factor of the Canon is 1.6, and Nikon is 1.5, which basically means that the image as seen through a 35mm camera will be cropped down 1.5 or 1.6 times to the center. Although this doesn't physically change the focal length of the lens, it gives an apparent change in focal length as the image will appear more zoomed in. For a lot of point and shoot cameras, they give an apparent rating of the lens - they may give the figure 28mm - 200mm which the range would be on a 35mm camera, but in fact the real lens focal lengths may be 3mm - 46mm, which tells you how incredibly small the sensor in the camera is.
For the general amateur photographer, sensor size may not be that important of an issue. Most point and shoot cameras have sensors barely bigger than a grain of sand (slight exaggeration). But if you upgrade yourself to a DSLR, the main choices you will get will be 4/3 inch, APS-C (Most Canon and Nikon) or Full Frame, in range of sizes. As sensor size increases, the more sensitive your camera will be to light, and the greater perceived size of the image will be.
The other point to keep in mind also is that the larger the sensor size, usually the more money you will have to invest in glass. Lenses for full frame cameras are usually much more expensive, but use higher quality optics and are very rugged. Also, it is much easier to capture wide to very wide angle photos with a full frame camera, since they capture more of the image and you can use lenses with lower focal lengths without getting the crop factor. On the other hand, smaller sensors give you more of a perceived zoom range, as a 200mm lens will give you the equivalent of around 320mm on a Canon/Nikon. As you can see there are positives and negatives to both sides, but most of the positives lie on the larger sensor sizes.
As a side note on the importance of sensor sizes, Red is offering both the Scarlet and Epic bodies with different sensor sizes starting from a 2/3 inch sensor in the Scarlet, through to a Super 35 and Full Frame 35 version. The 2/3 inch version is estimated to be $2,500 for the body, while the Super 35 version jumps up to $7,000. Full frame is a rather expensive $12,000.
The main point it comes down to will be your use for your digital still or film camera. How often will you have to use it in low light situations? Do you want to take ultra wide angle shots, or will be using mostly the other end of the scale with far zooms? With a greater knowledge of the effects of sensor size on photo taking, your camera choices will be more well informed.
Posted by
Dan McCallum
at
11:52 AM
0
comments
Labels: photography
Saturday, November 15, 2008
Why Photography Skills are Useful
Although I've been using various types of cameras for quite some time now, many years in fact, I didn't really learn much photographic essentials until I got myself a DSLR. Now, DSLR's are based off SLR cameras (but of course), so they maintain a lot of similarities. This in turn creates a steeper learning curve, as there are that many more things to keep in mind while you are taking a photo.
In saying that, anyone can take a photo with a regular point and shoot camera. But that is exactly what it is - you frame up the shot, push the button and the camera takes the picture. Some cameras give you a little more control over the image, for example limiting the sensitivity through ISO and occasionally shutter settings, but for the most part most people won't worry about changing anything. The camera does most the hard work, seeing all the aperture, shutter and settings for you to give what it thinks will be best for your photo. The other thing to keep in mind is that you're stuck with a fixed lens, which has a fixed zoom level and speed rating. This may be perfectly fine for most photographic needs, but one really doesn't learn too much about photography with a camera like this. You can learn composition and framing, but all the technical knowledge will mostly be lost on one of these cameras.
When I first got a DSLR, even with some knowledge of photographic terms learnt through my digital film making background, I was blown away with the sheer amount of information and options available to take pictures. Some DSLR's are making it easy, offering a full auto mode where you can operate them almost like a point in shoot camera, which is great for beginners. But if you really want to get the best from your camera, it will pay off to really look into all the different functions offered, and learn some of the photographic lingo and what everything means. All this knowledge can come in very handy if you're interested at all in anything to do with photography or imagery, for film making or certain areas of art.
It wasn't too long ago that I really had no idea about a lot of things - lens speeds, the effects of aperture and zoom on depth of field, the photographic differences between different focal lengths etc etc. One thing that surprised me the most was the absolute difficulty of manually focusing a lens with a wide open aperture - where you get a razor thin depth of field, meaning simply that only one tiny area of the image is going to be in focus... and you had better hope it is the right one. In doing any kind of cinematography work on a decent camera, these types of things will no doubt pop up, and at least with a working knowledge of photographic basics, one will know what to do.
So my advice is this - if you are interesting in photography at all, or any area where these types of skills might come in useful, you'd be well served to get yourself a DSLR camera. You don't even have to spend a lot of money - the entry level DSLR's like the Nikon D40 (which is the one I chose) or the Canon XS or XSi Rebel's are very good cameras for a fairly low price. And a little investment in this regard could help out in bucket loads further down the road if your area of interest lies around these kind of areas. I'm going to do a series of posts on the basics of photography, that can be applied to any photography or film making related area. Keep posted.
Posted by
Dan McCallum
at
9:43 AM
0
comments
Labels: film craft, photography
Friday, November 14, 2008
Changing Direction
Today I found myself wondering if I was really getting anywhere closer to where I wanted to be. It was a feeling of being stuck, or at least not really progressing towards any foreseeable goal. Being a rather future orientated person, this can become quite a big problem because with an unsure future ahead, what is there to look forward to?
I think a lot of people must feel a similar way at one time or another. Problems arise when dreams or expectations don't meet realities, because the world can be a difficult place. You can't really expect anybody other than yourself to get you where you want to go, which is why motivation and drive are so important.
At the moment, I'm working for a company called Bartle & Gibson, which is a Plumbing and Electrical wholesaler. The company itself is great, since it is a very relaxed environment and they really look after their employees - the pay is good, the bonuses are good, and they offer lots of supplies in the kitchen like drinks etc. The workers there are really good and friendly as well, which can be just as important. You can see from all these great things I have to say about the company that I should be happy, even lucky to be working at such a place. Unfortunately I'm not. I think the main problem is the fact that this job has absolutely nothing to do with the area I want to get into, which is film making. Sure, everything else is just great, but this important factor really bugs me.
I think for the most part most people are fairly easy to please - most people are perfectly happy to accept a stable job, get a stable place to live, and generally live a stable life without having to worry about much at all. The job gives them money, which they can use to put towards a house, car, and all the other little bits and pieces they really want. Of course, jobs don't usually give you much free time to yourself, so you're really giving up most of your time for the necessities of life, as well as a few things. For some reason its hard for me to accept that kind of life, and I know I'm not alone. I've met a lot of people, which I can only describe as "restless". The type of people that enjoy to travel, or who enjoy to work in jobs that offer a lot of variety and change.
This is one of the primary reasons that film making appeals to me. There is just so much variety and things to keep interest piqued.
Maybe its for the best that I am leaving there in three weeks time, although I'm sure I will miss the place and the people working there. As to what I will do after that, I'm not entirely sure right now. But I've decided to get back on track with my goals, and will keep everything posted.
“If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading.” Lao Tzu
Posted by
Dan McCallum
at
6:25 PM
0
comments
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Scarlet and Epic Unveiled
Finally after a long wait and much speculation, Scarlet and Epic have been unveiled to the world. And what is really amazing is how impressive it all is. They have really created an ambitious plan for the future, with the new models appearing to be ready around midway into 2009.
The main news was this - that both Scarlet and Epic were both part of the DSMC programme (Digital Stills and Motion Capture), and both are completely modular. In fact, rather jokingly Red admits that there are trillions of different combination, seeing how there are eight different versions of the body and a multitude of attachments you can connect to the "brains" or body.
The first choice is whether to go with a Scarlet or Epic body - both offer similar sensors sizes, except with the Epic you can go much bigger. The primary differences seem to lie in the body size and the data rate the body can capture, with Redcode 42 on the Scarlet's and Redcode 225 on the Epic's. There is even an extremely giant version of the Epic which records to Redcode 500, seeing as the sensor is a ginormous 261MP and 18.6cm x 56cm big, which simply seems unbelievable. All yours for only $55,000.
It looks as though Red founder and head Jim Jannard really listening to peoples requests for the new cameras - one of the main requests was for Scarlet to have an interchangable lens, which it now does. Well, that is one option for it, you can also get the version with the fixed 8x lens if you so wish.
The only way to really get a feel for all the new announcements is to slowly make your way through this massive breakdown page which will give you all the amazing details. It looks as though they have totally blown people's expectations away with these new announcements.
Posted by
Dan McCallum
at
5:49 PM
0
comments
Friday, October 31, 2008
November 13th
Excitement is mounting over at the Red website, since in just a few days (soon to be a couple of days) they are going to release new information on the complete overhaul of both their upcoming Scarlet and Epic product lines. It only takes a quick visit to the sites forums to see how much people are really getting worked up, with most the attention seeming to be drawn towards the Scarlet camera.
Red have also released a few cryptic renders of zoomed in shots of either Scarlet/Epic, only showing glimpses of the product and causing much speculation. It seems as though, due to the Canon MkII's impressive capabilities, Red decided to completely overhaul their lines to compete more directly.
Of course the cameras will be very different beasts. It is kind of like comparing Intel CPU's to the AMD's of yesteryear- The Canon will certainly have a bigger sensor size, seeing as how it is already much bigger than the one in the current Red One camera, so has more raw power in theory just like Intel always had the faster clock speeds. But the power in Scarlet is of its speed and shooting format, which I liken to AMD's choice to increase bandwidth rather than raw power. Scarlet will shoot in lossless compressed RAW, which will offer the absolute most control over the final look of the footage, since you have so many options to play around with. RAW is a powerful format, since it means that the data captured by the camera hasn't been altered or limited in any way. White balance can be changed instantly, as well as tinkering with exposure levels as well as a multitude other settings. You can do similar things with finished formats, but only to a shallow certain extent - push too far and you will get very unnatural looking results.
I think this is where Scarlet's primary power will lie - in the amount of control and choices you will get with the footage, as well as the quicker frame rates and modularity. No doubt the Canon 5D MkII will be popular and have its uses, but for more serious productions on an especially tight budget, the Scarlet should be the better choice.
Guess we'll have to wait another couple of days just to see exactly what is revealed.
Posted by
Dan McCallum
at
10:30 AM
0
comments
Labels: red
Friday, October 17, 2008
New Options for the Budget Filmmaker
Looks as though we are coming up to some fairly exciting times, with a couple of cameras being released in the near future that look to make it a lot easier to get premium, professional looking footage without an enormous price tag. Although technology seems to be moving fast at the moment, its seems like digital video has been around for a long time, and for times has progressed very slowly. Of course it didn't make too much of a difference if the video was destined for the standard resolution television screen or regular dvd, but high definition has changed the game plan somewhat. Also as cameras move away from tape based systems to solid-state media, we've also seen a lot of horrible compression systems and file formats. But times are good at the moment, because some really solid offerings are coming along for the filmmaker that can't afford professional equipment, which I'm guessing is a great deal of people. Judging by the enormous amount of activity on the Red forums, I'd say there are a lot of people out there very interested in good value filming solutions.
The first camera I have already mentioned, which is the Scarlet camera by Red. They have mentioned on the site that the camera is currently being completely redesigned due to current changes in the market, and will hopefully be releasing some information about it in November, with units shipping in large quantities some time in 2009.
The second camera was just unveiled recently, but is already gathering quite a bit of attention. The strange thing is that it isn't even specifically made for video - the camera I'm talking about is the Canon 5D MkII, which is an attractively priced semi-professional DSLR. This camera has a huge full-sized 35mm sensor (35.8x23.9mm) which means it can use the full gamut of 35mm lenses without crop factor, and produces very clean images with a high dynamic range even in low light settings. The sensor itself is an amazing 21.1MP. The feature that is getting the most attention however is the movie mode, which offers both 1920x1080 and 640x480 resolutions @30fps. There are a lot of people out there hoping that Canon will either release the camera with a 24fps mode as well for more cinematic style shooting, or allow a firmware update in the future to provide this setting.
A short film has already been shot with a beta version of the Canon camera, and looks quite sharp. The stills in particular look insanely detailed and colorful. Check out this link for the film, Reverie.
There are a few drawbacks to keep in mind about this camera, however, the main one being that this is primarily a stills DSLR first and foremost, so the movie feature isn't going to be as strong as its main purpose. Some of the issues coming up are the skew (jello looking footage from sharp movements), although it is nowhere near as bad as the Nikon D90. Also the footage output, which is converted directly to H.264 in camera may not be the best option for more professional productions or discerning users (compression issues and more processing power required for editing). A possible workaround for the compression issues is the availability of an HDMI port, which may offer uncompressed HD output. Guess we'll have to see how that goes once the camera is officially released.
Still, the price of $2,700 for the body is very attractive, especially considering Pro-sumer camcorders can go for $5,000 upwards and have largely inferior specifications.
It will be very interesting to see how the Scarlet camera pans out in light of this recent news, and also the DSMC (Digital Still Movie Camera) Red is working on as well. It can only work to the budget filmmakers advantage with all these great innovations coming out.
Posted by
Dan McCallum
at
9:23 AM
2
comments
Labels: canon 5D MkII, scarlet